<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blair should either resign or state a date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2006/09/06/blair-should-either-resign-or-state-a-date/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2006/09/06/blair-should-either-resign-or-state-a-date/</link>
	<description>Liberal Democrat MP for North East Fife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2006/09/06/blair-should-either-resign-or-state-a-date/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2006/09/06/blair-should-either-resign-or-state-a-date/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>What is wrong with challenging the whole ethos of &quot;appointing a successor&quot;? Where in our, admittedly, unwritten constitution, does it say that a serving PM can &quot;appoint&quot; a successor. If the PM were dead, or incapacitated, his deputy (heaven forfend) would take over. Gordon Brown is NOT his deputy, is NOT the leader of the Labour party - and I feel there is no guarantee that he will be - so why are we not challenging the assumption of &quot;crown prince&quot;?

I am not the only average &quot;Joe&quot; discussing this, but nothing very strong is coming out of either of the opposition parties. 

As a &quot;just&quot; ex-councillor, and member of the Lib Dems, I am very disappointed about the &#039;lack&#039; of strong comment.

Kind regards,

Lesley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is wrong with challenging the whole ethos of &#8220;appointing a successor&#8221;? Where in our, admittedly, unwritten constitution, does it say that a serving PM can &#8220;appoint&#8221; a successor. If the PM were dead, or incapacitated, his deputy (heaven forfend) would take over. Gordon Brown is NOT his deputy, is NOT the leader of the Labour party &#8211; and I feel there is no guarantee that he will be &#8211; so why are we not challenging the assumption of &#8220;crown prince&#8221;?</p>
<p>I am not the only average &#8220;Joe&#8221; discussing this, but nothing very strong is coming out of either of the opposition parties. </p>
<p>As a &#8220;just&#8221; ex-councillor, and member of the Lib Dems, I am very disappointed about the &#8216;lack&#8217; of strong comment.</p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Lesley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

