Comments on: Liberal Democrats launch petition on Freedom of Information

By: A polite liberal

A polite liberal — Tue, 22 May 2007 13:50:07 +0000

It’s possible to rage and to be polite at the same time you know

By: simon gandolfi

simon gandolfi — Tue, 22 May 2007 12:35:42 +0000

I abhor the bill. However I have no faith in the Liberal Democrat palimentarians mustering any useful oposition. In an argument with Ming Cambell recently (in Malvern), Ming assured me that he had been most robust. Most robust!!! He is so well mannered, at his most robust, he would leave the surface of a cup of tea undisturbed. Where, for God’s sake, is the observable rage at what is being done by Parliament in our name?

By: Michael Bird

Michael Bird — Tue, 22 May 2007 12:13:04 +0000

I read with great interest your rejection to the apparent immunity of some mp’s to the freedom of information act and indeed suggested my comments to several mp’s on the day of the private members bill. I was assured that because of the obvious parlimentary time problem that this bill would not see the light of day!, however i was wrong!.
Secondly, the fact that this bill was in priority over a child protection one upon that day is a disgrace and those who voted fior this should bear there heads in disgrace, though if one rule should be good for one, then it should be for all, i was under the impression that is what democracy was suppose to be about!!
You have my complete and 100% support for this campaign!