Hong Kong – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, I do not disagree with any of the exchanges so far, but I am rather concerned about the extent to which our options in this matter are limited. It was said that the United Kingdom’s interests finished at the time of the handover. If that becomes the official policy of the Chinese Government, there is not much that we can do in respect of that, is there?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Hong Kong – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

Turkey: Russian Missiles – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, does the noble Earl accept that the political implications of this matter are just as important as the military? Does he recall that Mr Putin has twin foreign policy objectives? The first is the undermining of the European Union—with which he has had some assistance from the United Kingdom. The second is the destabilisation of NATO. The difficulty is that the United States has only recently offered Turkey the Patriot system, while Turkey has bought the S-400. The fact is that Mr Putin will not be laughing up his sleeve in the Kremlin—he will be laughing out loud.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Turkey: Russian Missiles – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

Turkey: Russian Missiles – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, does the noble Earl accept that the political implications of this matter are just as important as the military? Does he recall that Mr Putin has twin foreign policy objectives? The first is the undermining of the European Union—with which he has had some assistance from the United Kingdom. The second is the destabilisation of NATO. The difficulty is that the United States has only recently offered Turkey the Patriot system, while Turkey has bought the S-400. The fact is that Mr Putin will not be laughing up his sleeve in the Kremlin—he will be laughing out loud.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Turkey: Russian Missiles – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

Detainee Mistreatment and Rendition – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, I declare an interest as a member of the Intelligence and Security Committee between 2008 and 2015. With the benefit of hindsight, does the noble Lord consider that it was appropriate to prevent that committee from continuing with its investigations, and that it would have been entirely proper for it to continue an investigation which it had already begun?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Detainee Mistreatment and Rendition – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

UK’s Ambassador to the USA: Resignation – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, is not Sir Kim the only person to end with any credit in this matter? The person who leaked the details, the President and the overweening ambition of Mr Boris Johnson are very happy reminders of just how noble the decision of Sir Kim Darroch has been.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on UK’s Ambassador to the USA: Resignation – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates