Army: Divisional Manoeuvre and Deployment Training – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

Does the Minister agree that the exercise proposed by the noble Earl, Lord Attlee, in his Question is much more satisfactory than any desk-bound exercise, if I may put it that way, not least because it allows the demonstration of capability as a practical illustration of deterrence and provides reassurance for our allies? Why does the Army not take the opportunity of a showcase to show that it possesses all these qualities?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Army: Divisional Manoeuvre and Deployment Training – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

RAF: Operational Conversion Unit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, the noble Earl will be aware that the Defence Secretary, in an interview with the Sunday Telegraph, made the rather surprising admission that it was his ambition to open some new military bases in the Far East and the Caribbean. Can we be satisfied that any decision of that kind will not undermine the original commitment to purchase 138 F35 aircraft, particularly given the fragile state of the equipment budget?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on RAF: Operational Conversion Unit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

RAF: Operational Conversion Unit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, the noble Earl will be aware that the Defence Secretary, in an interview with the Sunday Telegraph, made the rather surprising admission that it was his ambition to open some new military bases in the Far East and the Caribbean. Can we be satisfied that any decision of that kind will not undermine the original commitment to purchase 138 F35 aircraft, particularly given the fragile state of the equipment budget?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on RAF: Operational Conversion Unit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

RAF: Operational Conversion Unit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, the noble Earl will be aware that the Defence Secretary, in an interview with the Sunday Telegraph, made the rather surprising admission that it was his ambition to open some new military bases in the Far East and the Caribbean. Can we be satisfied that any decision of that kind will not undermine the original commitment to purchase 138 F35 aircraft, particularly given the fragile state of the equipment budget?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on RAF: Operational Conversion Unit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

Yemen – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, these developments are obviously to be welcomed and those responsible are certainly entitled to congratulations, but looking through the Statement, I see no reference to Iran. Iran is playing a significant role in these affairs in Yemen. What exchange has there been involving Her Majesty’s Government—either between the Foreign Secretary and his Iranian equivalent or at the United Nations, between Karen Pierce, our high representative, and her equivalent?

Secondly, resolutions of this kind have previously fallen foul of the objection of both Russia and China. What efforts are being made to ensure that in this instance they will be on side?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Yemen – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates