Royal Navy: Type 31e Frigate – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, the noble Earl’s reply to the noble Lord a few moments ago was, to say the least, concise. He failed, however, to point out that the contract for the Type 31 has been restarted. Part of the problem, as the Government have indicated in their reason for restarting, is that the bids that were received were “not compliant”. I understand that to mean that the capability that the Government seek is not deliverable at the price of £250 million per ship. On that basis, the Government have a choice to make: either to reduce the capability or to increase the price. Unless they do one of those things, the exports on which the Government have set great store will not be achieved.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Royal Navy: Type 31e Frigate – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

Brexit: Negotiations and No-deal Contingency Planning – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

The Minister made a brave, if failing effort to try to ascribe responsibility for the border issue to Dublin. We have a responsibility—it is called the Good Friday agreement. We have a responsibility both morally and legally not to do anything that undermines that agreement. Do the Government accept that, both morally and legally?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Brexit: Negotiations and No-deal Contingency Planning – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

United Nations Relief and Works Agency – <i>Private Notice Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, does not the Minister understand that this decision is both mean-spirted and tactically inept? It is mean-spirited because of the nature of the work done by UNRWA, and tactfully inept because nothing is more likely to stiffen the resolve of the Palestinian people than such decisions.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on United Nations Relief and Works Agency – <i>Private Notice Question</i> | Lords debates

Brexit: Preparations and Negotiations – <i>Motion to Take Note</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, what a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, although I have to say that I do not agree with very much of what he has said.

I came with a detailed exegesis of the White Paper, but since I am the 64th person to make a speech in this debate and we are already almost an hour behind the time at which we were supposed to finish, I shall leave that—no doubt to the relief of Members of the House—to another day.

I might just make a point about immigration: there were not too many complaints in the United Kingdom when Polish and Czech pilots came and flew over Kent and gave their lives in the Battle of Britain, any more perhaps than when the Polish airborne division went on and was cut to pieces, along with others, on that occasion.

Let me turn to a point introduced by the noble Lord, Lord—a terrible moment; I have forgotten his name.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Brexit: Preparations and Negotiations – <i>Motion to Take Note</i> | Lords debates

Brexit: Preparations and Negotiations – <i>Motion to Take Note</i> | Lords debates

No. It is ridiculous. We travelled on the plane this morning.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Brexit: Preparations and Negotiations – <i>Motion to Take Note</i> | Lords debates