Brexit: Article 50 – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, we all believe in the freedom of the press and in the independence of the judiciary. But I doubt very much whether there is a single one of your Lordships who does not believe in the supremacy and sovereignty of Parliament. The decision made by the High Court judges underlines and ensures the application of that doctrine. Why, in the four corners of this Statement, is there no reference to the sovereignty of Parliament?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Brexit: Article 50 – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

Brexit: Article 50 – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

My Lords—

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Brexit: Article 50 – <i>Statement</i> | Lords debates

Brexit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, I appreciate that the noble Lord has restricted himself in the comments he may make, but perhaps I may ask him whether he agrees with two principles. The first is that, no matter how high you are, the law is above you. Secondly, will he affirm unequivocally the sovereignty of Parliament?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Brexit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

Brexit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, I appreciate that the noble Lord has restricted himself in the comments he may make, but perhaps I may ask him whether he agrees with two principles. The first is that, no matter how high you are, the law is above you. Secondly, will he affirm unequivocally the sovereignty of Parliament?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Brexit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

Brexit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, I appreciate that the noble Lord has restricted himself in the comments he may make, but perhaps I may ask him whether he agrees with two principles. The first is that, no matter how high you are, the law is above you. Secondly, will he affirm unequivocally the sovereignty of Parliament?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Brexit – <i>Question</i> | Lords debates