Police: Vetting, Misconduct and Misogyny – <i>Private Notice Question</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, is not the essence of this report contained in the third paragraph of the foreword, which says:

“Some police officers have used their unique position to commit appalling crimes, especially against women. Some forces have repeatedly failed to implement recommendations – from us and other bodies – that were designed to prevent and detect such behaviour”?

Who is responsible for ensuring that the police implement these recommendations?

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Police: Vetting, Misconduct and Misogyny – <i>Private Notice Question</i> | Lords debates

Amendment 7 | Northern Ireland Protocol Bill – <i>Committee (2nd Day)</i> | Lords debates

But if the consequence of doing so is to embrace a Bill which drives a horse and cart through the procedures and principles by which this Parliament operates, surely that is an inhibition and we should avoid it at all costs.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Amendment 7 | Northern Ireland Protocol Bill – <i>Committee (2nd Day)</i> | Lords debates

Amendment 7 | Northern Ireland Protocol Bill – <i>Committee (2nd Day)</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, I will not rehearse what I said previously about Article 16, but I will see if I can answer the question posed by the noble Lord, Lord Lilley. If you are faced with two instruments that appear to be in conflict—which I think is what we are arguing—the first thing you do is have a detailed analysis of these instruments to see whether there is a provision in them that will enable you to reconcile the difference. The advantage of Article 16 has just been set out by the noble Lord, Lord Kerr. You are adhering to the treaty by using a term within the treaty that helps you avoid being in conflict with the other treaty. That is a possible way of doing it.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Amendment 7 | Northern Ireland Protocol Bill – <i>Committee (2nd Day)</i> | Lords debates

Amendment 7 | Northern Ireland Protocol Bill – <i>Committee (2nd Day)</i> | Lords debates

But if the consequence of doing so is to embrace a Bill which drives a horse and cart through the procedures and principles by which this Parliament operates, surely that is an inhibition and we should avoid it at all costs.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Amendment 7 | Northern Ireland Protocol Bill – <i>Committee (2nd Day)</i> | Lords debates

Amendment 7 | Northern Ireland Protocol Bill – <i>Committee (2nd Day)</i> | Lords debates

My Lords, I will not rehearse what I said previously about Article 16, but I will see if I can answer the question posed by the noble Lord, Lord Lilley. If you are faced with two instruments that appear to be in conflict—which I think is what we are arguing—the first thing you do is have a detailed analysis of these instruments to see whether there is a provision in them that will enable you to reconcile the difference. The advantage of Article 16 has just been set out by the noble Lord, Lord Kerr. You are adhering to the treaty by using a term within the treaty that helps you avoid being in conflict with the other treaty. That is a possible way of doing it.

Posted in Hansard | Comments Off on Amendment 7 | Northern Ireland Protocol Bill – <i>Committee (2nd Day)</i> | Lords debates